(Reuters) - Ballot measures to legalize marijuana in Washington state and Colorado gained support this week from a pair of prominent Republicans - U.S. Senate candidate Michael Baumgartner and former Representative Tom Tancredo - who could help sway conservative voters.
No state has ever legalized
marijuana for recreational use. The federal government considers it an
illegal drug, but 17 states and the District of Columbia allow it as
medicine.
Baumgartner, the
Republican challenger to Washington state's Democratic Senator Maria
Cantwell, said in a phone interview the state initiative, which would
allow the sale of marijuana to people 21 and older at state-sanctioned
stores, is a "thoughtful way forward."
"It
checks a lot of boxes we want to see, in terms of children not being
exposed, in terms of not increasing marijuana usage and not allowing it
in public spaces," Baumgartner said.
Tancredo,
who served five terms in the House of Representatives from 1999 to
2009, this week endorsed the legalization campaign in Colorado. He
argued government should not interfere with people's choice to use pot.
In
Oregon, a third state where voters this November will decide whether to
allow recreational use of pot, the campaign has struggled to find big
name Republican supporters.
Legalization
opponent Kevin Sabet, a former adviser to the Obama administration's
drug policy director, disputed the argument of many libertarians that
government should not interfere in pot use by people.
"The
libertarian argument is fundamentally flawed because drug use does not
affect just the individual, it affects healthcare costs, criminal
justice costs that we see with a legal drug like alcohol and costs to
our highway safety," Sabet said.
(Writing by Alex Dobuzinskis; editing by Mohammad Zargham)
Sabet's comment just doesn't make good sense though... "The libertarian argument is fundamentally flawed because drug use does not affect just the individual, it affects healthcare costs, criminal justice costs that we see with a legal drug like alcohol and costs to our highway safety,"...
......Peace
Sabet's comment just doesn't make good sense though... "The libertarian argument is fundamentally flawed because drug use does not affect just the individual, it affects healthcare costs, criminal justice costs that we see with a legal drug like alcohol and costs to our highway safety,"...
Alcohol speeds up the driver while dulling the driver's senses, and is the quickest way to a marital argument, as well as the root cause of far too many violent crimes worldwide. Alcohol poisoning is also the result of a night of binge drinking; the hangover in most cases, but some do end up as an emergency situation, and the majority of bad choices most people make in their lives are while under the influence of alcohol... Need I go on....?
Marijuana, on the other hand, slows down the driver, creates a peaceful form of thought, making arguments appear comical, and the worst 'hangover' from pot is sleeping in, sometimes very late. It is not physically addictive, and if our world leaders made their decisions during a marijuana toast, instead of a big party alcohol toast, we would have far less wars...