Mainstream News has become the Band on the Titanic....
Alternative, Breaking, World News that Reports what the Mainstream Media Ignores.
Welcome to "The Honest Intelligence"
Please see Copyright information at bottom of page...

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

4 Star Admiral Accuses Obama of Being a Benghazi Co-Conspirator

Why was the US military ordered to stand down for [at least 7] hours as Jihadists attacked the US embassy?

Why was security gutted right before the attack?

On Fox News the Admiral has today spoken about the 150+ Marine unit at Signonella [he may have been referring to the Fleet Anti-Terrorism Support Team in Rota, Spain], and the availability of jets, all within 2 hours at most of the beseiged CIA unit in Benghazi.  For who are unfamiliar with similar cover-ups in the past, remember the USS Liberty.  We are not satisfied with the view that Admiral Stevens (RIP) was the lead for the transfer of Libyan military weapons to the Syrian rebels, we would have expected at a minimum some form of US military logistics presence; and if this was small enough for CIA to handle, it did not need an Ambassador.  The complete story is still lacking.
A retired four star admiral; Admiral James Lyons believes that Obama wanted Jihadists to kidnap the ambassador.  That way Obama could negotiate his release and then be praised as a hero by the media.

The Obama administration admits to arming the brutal murderous Sinaloa drug cartel in Mexico. Hundreds of innocent people, including two American cops, have been killed with weapons provided by the Obama administration. What else is Obama capable of?


It’s even worse than we previously thought. A retired four-star admiral is now claiming that Barack Obama intentionally conspired with America’s enemies to stage a bogus attack and the kidnapping of an American ambassador so he could “negotiate” the release of a “hostage” and bolster his mediocre approval ratings just prior to the election?

The Washington Examiner, quoting retired Four-Star Admiral James Lyons, writes: “the attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi… was the result of a bungled abduction attempt…. the first stage of an international prisoner exchange… that would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman, the ‘Blind Sheik’…”

But something went horribly wrong with Obama’s “October Surprise.” Although the Obama Administration intentionally gutted security at the consulate prior to the staged kidnapping, former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty disobeyed direct orders to stand down, saved American lives, single-handedly killed scores of attackers…and the attackers, believing that the Obama had betrayed them, tortured Ambassador Chris Stevens and dragged his body through the streets.

… Benghazi-gate is not about a bogus YouTube video series of lies. It’s not about the Obama Administration’s foreign policy ineptitude. We are dealing with something much more sinister… something potentially treasonous… and the following questions, posed in an article in The New American, go to the heart of the matter:

1. “What was the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent Jihadists, self-styled al Qaeda terrorists, and Western-backed “revolutionaries” take over Libya in the first place?

2. Did that half-baked scheme to arm Jihadist leaders, who… had previously fought U.S. troops in Iraq, contribute to the attack, as countless experts and officials have suggested?

3. What was actually going on at the compound in Benghazi, which as the report states, was never a “consulate” despite establishment media claims?

4. Was Ambassador Stevens recruiting and arming Jihadists and terrorists to wage war on the Syrian regime after what Obama called the “success” in Libya, as a growing body of credible evidence suggests?

5. Why did the administration claim for so long that the attack was just a “protest” over a YouTube video gone awry, even when it knew definitively that was not the case?

6. Was the lack of security at the compound a political ploy to conceal the extent of the lawlessness and utter chaos left in the wake of Obama’s unconstitutional “regime change” war on Libya, as even members of Congress have alleged?”

It’s clear. Benghazi-Gate is only a small piece of a much larger operation, an attempt to conceal what The New American calls; “the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent Jihadists and self-styled al Qaeda terrorists.”

The White House and the State Dept WATCHED live video from an overhead drone, over Benghazi, in real-time, as the attacks played out and murders took place.

The SEALs on the ground called for help THREE TIMES, and were DENIED;

No action was taken; no troops were deployed to aid those under siege in the SEVEN HOUR ATTACK!  Obama and his administration did nothing while they watched the whole attack, from beginning to end, from the drone’s camera they had overhead the whole time..

Obama lied to cover this up!  
The Administration and Congress refused to hold investigative hearings until AFTER the Election!

General Petraeus was aware of the calls for reinforcements from the annex within 24 hours, which means that Obama knew. 

The more we learn, the worse the stench.

…General Petraeus did not intentionally fall upon his sword for having an affair or for disgracing his position or the country.  He was forced to side with the White House in the Benghazi, Libya cover up and now we know why.

Was the general being blackmailed by Obama or members of his administration to remain silent on the Benghazi assaults to cover up the cover up, and to protect the liar in the White House?

Was Petraeus forced to keep his dalliance with Broadwell under wraps just long enough for Obama to be re-elected, and once re-elected did the narcissist in the Oval Office hand Petraeus a big f-u?

Considering that 50% of Washington D.C. is cheating on their spouses, I ask, had it not been for the Benghazi attacks and the cover up by the Obama administration, would the affair between Broadwell and General Petraeus [ever] have become public knowledge?

President Barack Obama told aides that he is "...really good at killing people."

[……] it seemed the president was pondering the drone program that he had expanded so dramatically and with such lethal results,[ ………].

"Turns out I'm really good at killing people," Obama said quietly, "Didn't know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine."