Mainstream News has become the Band on the Titanic....
Alternative, Breaking, World News that Reports what the Mainstream Media Ignores.
Welcome to "The Honest Intelligence"
Please see Copyright information at bottom of page...
COMET ISON HAS SURVIVED PERIHELION - I will keep the updates coming as I get them here (SCROLL DOWN TO LAST [BOTTOM] VIDEOS FOR LATEST UPDATES):
This is BIG NEWS!!! ISON HAS SURVIVED! Now we will be able to look forward to more viewing with the unaided eye, as we move into December!
UPDATED VIDEOS, SINCE THE UPPER ONE, BELOW:
So, so far. we know that ISON is 'close' to it's projected path back towards us... More to come...
You can hit: CTRL-F5 to renew this page; to see any updates as we go through the night.
Updates are slow coming; I suppose the new projected path, size, integrity, etc are being calibrated. As any updates come, I will have them here, so keep checking back.
LATEST: 11/28/13 @ 9:25 PM EST: ISON has changed it's shape, and is brightening in it's path out of the perihelion:
This is Comet ISON captured by STEREO Behind COR2 from Nov 26 - 29. Spectacular footage showing ISON's survival through the perihelion:
LATEST UPDATE: 11/28/13 @ 11:30 PM EST: ISON's debris trail appears to have widened. We'll know more tomorrow, but still adding updates here. We will learn more about ISON's changes together.
UPDATE - 11/29/13 @ 3:00 - It appears that ISON is highly fragmented now, as it travels away from the sun:
UPDATE - 11/30/13 - ISON NOW A BALL OF SHRAPNEL:
UPDATE - 12/01/13 - ISON Spreading Out Fast:
UPDATE - 12/01/13 - ISON's Rate of Spread Calculated/CA.QUAKE WATCH!
ABSOLUTELY NOT SURE WHAT TO MAKE OF THIS NEXT VIDEO.
As ISON exited the perihelion, and all heads and eyes worldwide were focussed toward the sun, 'something' else came into camera view from the opposite direction. How far away from the camera this object is, is not known; as NASA has scrubbed the section of video it was in, so they will not be disclosing any information about it, to us, any time soon, BUT job terminations did occur over the section of video that did actually show before NASA was able to delay it, and scrub it from the video.
This gentleman, that has been covering the vital points of the space camera's streams during ISON's voyage, has been constantly recording all the space cameras data. He has the video from BEFORE it got scrubbed: (Honestly, I just don't know what to think about this...I believe this camera is in our orbit, so could it just be a glimpse of another planet as it passes between our cam and the sun?.. So why would they scrub it, if it's just another planet in our solar system? )
LATEST UPDATE - "ISON SURVIVES PERIHELION!!"
>>>BOTTOM VIDEO; MORE INFO HERE AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE!!!!
Live coverage will begin on Nov 28th, and will cover Comet ISON in it's perihelion around the sun.
Right now, what you are seeing is the generic coverage; preparing to go live on Nov 28th, and stay live as it travels around our sun.
Will it survive the perihelion, or will it break apart; NASA is not saying. All we can do is watch and see.
Appologies for the server tie-up in the above video (can't believe they didn't allow for more live viewers) Below is another live site from NASA's Google hangout. This WAS the LIVE discussion with SOHO visual updates as they got them:
In the meantime, I'm updating this video below as it comes in. IF, NASA does update their visual data for our eyes, I will be featuring it below:
ISON SURVIVED PERIHELION!!!!! This is the last update on this column, but I have started a New story, covering ISON's survival, trajectory, etc., as it comes in HERE.
This woman, and the group of Whistleblowers she is with are people from POWERFUL Positions, and they have 'had it up to here,' with the amount of corruption they have uncovered.
They are getting their proverbial ducks in a row.
These people believe they will be able to finally put an end to the corruption worldwide! Let's hope they can end this before Fukushima takes us out!
I believe we need to support this woman, and her group, and trust that they will; (most likely with some of the world leaders, and their militaries supporting them) overturn the thugs and thieves in the circles of the elites.
 |
| Former Senior [Attorney] Counsellor of The World Bank, Karen Hudes is talking, and telling the truth to the world. She says she and the other World Bank Whistleblowers have banded together, and will end the corruption so we can take our nation back. |
We have been searching and searching for that elusive vein of truth in the corrupt world of today. We look for this truth because we know we are being lied to by our mainstream media outlets, such as CNN, MSNBC, FOXNEWS, etc. Truth is the only ammunition we need that will actually help us to know what to do, where to go, how to end our enslavement, and how to destroy those who would see us destroyed.
We have reached a point in our existance here that is very dangerous, and if we do not act now, we will have only to pray to whatever Gods our ancestors prayed to and walked with.
The result, of this sense of urgency that is crossing the world like a tsunami, is that more and more people are turning to alternative, freelance reporters and activist bloggers to find the bits and pieces of little veins of truth.
As a freelance journalist that is driven to find and share the truths, I must now say that the information this highly educated, former Senior Counsellor of The World Bank, is such a large vein of truth, one may say that this interview just could be the 'Mother Load.'
So get yourself a cup of tea, or java, or whatever, and plan to sit for around 30 minutes or so, and click to play this video; watch it from beginning to end... You WILL be floored and amazed!
As with most Videos that reveal the truth about our current administration and the Elites pulling the strings through the Federal Reserve Bank, youtube takes these videos off line.
I have downloaded the video, so if that occurs, I will upload it here, to continue to be viewed.
This is very important information, and it MUST NOT be allowed to be silenced!
UPDATE: Karen Hudes states to mainstream media that she and the other wistleblowers are winning, and WILL win:
The Link to Karen Hudes' website is: http://kahudes.net/ to keep in touch with her and their (all the Wistleblowers) progress. This is good news folks, but we must support her by acting on writing letters to the list of governers and senators at her site, as well as other ways; including contacting her through her website.
Why was the US military ordered to stand down for [at least 7] hours as Jihadists
attacked the US embassy?
Why was security gutted right before the attack?
 |
On
Fox News the Admiral has today spoken about the 150+ Marine unit at Signonella
[he may have been referring to the Fleet Anti-Terrorism Support Team in Rota,
Spain], and the availability of jets, all within 2 hours at most of the
beseiged CIA unit in Benghazi. For who are unfamiliar with similar
cover-ups in the past, remember the USS Liberty. We are not satisfied
with the view that Admiral Stevens (RIP) was the lead for the transfer of
Libyan military weapons to the Syrian rebels, we would have expected at a
minimum some form of US military logistics presence; and if this was small
enough for CIA to handle, it did not need an Ambassador. The complete
story is still lacking.
|
A retired four star admiral; Admiral James Lyons believes that Obama wanted Jihadists to kidnap the ambassador. That way Obama could negotiate his release and then be praised as a hero by the media.
The Obama administration admits to arming the brutal murderous Sinaloa drug
cartel in Mexico. Hundreds of innocent people, including two American cops,
have been killed with weapons provided by the Obama administration. What else
is Obama capable of?
From GOP USA…
It’s even worse than we previously thought. A retired four-star admiral is now claiming that Barack Obama intentionally conspired with America’s enemies to stage a bogus attack and the kidnapping of an American ambassador so he could “negotiate” the release of a “hostage” and bolster his mediocre approval ratings just prior to the election?
The Washington Examiner, quoting retired Four-Star Admiral James Lyons, writes: “the attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi… was the result of a bungled abduction attempt…. the first stage of an international prisoner exchange… that would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman, the ‘Blind Sheik’…”
But something went horribly wrong with Obama’s “October Surprise.” Although the Obama Administration intentionally gutted security at the consulate prior to the staged kidnapping, former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty disobeyed direct orders to stand down, saved American lives, single-handedly killed scores of attackers…and the attackers, believing that the Obama had betrayed them, tortured Ambassador Chris Stevens and dragged his body through the streets.
… Benghazi-gate is not about a bogus YouTube video series of lies. It’s not about the Obama Administration’s foreign policy ineptitude. We are dealing with something much more sinister… something potentially treasonous… and the following questions, posed in an article in The New American, go to the heart of the matter:
1. “What was the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent Jihadists, self-styled al Qaeda terrorists, and Western-backed “revolutionaries” take over Libya in the first place?
2. Did that half-baked scheme to arm Jihadist leaders, who… had previously fought U.S. troops in Iraq, contribute to the attack, as countless experts and officials have suggested?
3. What was actually going on at the compound in Benghazi, which as the report states, was never a “consulate” despite establishment media claims?
4. Was Ambassador Stevens recruiting and arming Jihadists and terrorists to wage war on the Syrian regime after what Obama called the “success” in Libya, as a growing body of credible evidence suggests?
5. Why did the administration claim for so long that the attack was just a “protest” over a YouTube video gone awry, even when it knew definitively that was not the case?
6. Was the lack of security at the compound a political ploy to conceal the extent of the lawlessness and utter chaos left in the wake of Obama’s unconstitutional “regime change” war on Libya, as even members of Congress have alleged?”
It’s clear. Benghazi-Gate is only a small piece of a much larger operation, an attempt to conceal what The New American calls; “the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent Jihadists and self-styled al Qaeda terrorists.”
…………………
The White House and the State Dept WATCHED live video from an overhead drone, over Benghazi, in real-time, as the attacks played out and murders took place.
The SEALs on the ground called for help THREE TIMES, and were DENIED;
THE SEALS ALSO DIED!
No action was taken; no troops were deployed to aid those under siege in the SEVEN HOUR ATTACK! Obama and his administration did nothing while they watched the whole attack, from beginning to end, from the drone’s camera they had overhead the whole time..
Obama lied to cover this up!
The
Administration and Congress refused to hold investigative hearings until AFTER
the Election!
General Petraeus was aware of the calls for reinforcements from the annex within 24 hours, which means that Obama knew.
The more we learn, the worse the stench.
…General Petraeus did not intentionally fall upon his sword for having an affair or for disgracing his position or the country. He was forced to side with the White House in the Benghazi, Libya cover up and now we know why.
Was the general being blackmailed by Obama or members of his administration to remain silent on the Benghazi assaults to cover up the cover up, and to protect the liar in the White House?
Was Petraeus forced to keep his dalliance with Broadwell under wraps just long enough for Obama to be re-elected, and once re-elected did the narcissist in the Oval Office hand Petraeus a big f-u?
Considering that 50% of Washington D.C. is cheating on their spouses, I ask, had it not been for the Benghazi attacks and the cover up by the Obama administration, would the affair between Broadwell and General Petraeus [ever] have become public knowledge?
President Barack
Obama told aides that he is "...really good at killing people."
[……] it seemed the president was pondering the drone program that he had expanded so dramatically and with such lethal results,[ ………].
"Turns out I'm really good at killing people," Obama said quietly, "Didn't know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine."
................
sources:
Rep. Steve Stockman, R-Texas, recently handed out copies of a book
that has been described by its authors as the “articles of impeachment”
for Barack Obama, and suggested that special investigations, and
possibly prosecutions, are needed over Fast and Furious, Benghazi and
other Obama scandals.
But Stockman is not the only member of Congress to discuss
impeachment in response to the actions of Obama and his administration. A
total of 15 members have discussed this idea recently.
Rep. Bill Flores, R-Texas, was speaking at a town hall meeting when
he considered the idea. A video of his comments was posted at the
Western Center for Journalism.
“I’ve looked at the president. I think he’s violated the Constitution. I think he’s violated the Bill of Rights,” he said.
He said at some point a decision must be made.
“I think if the House had an impeachment vote it would probably impeach the president.”
But he noted there are only 46 members of the GOP in the U.S. Senate, where an impeached president would be put on trial.
To obtain a conviction, the prosecuting team must have 67 votes, and he wasn’t sure that even all of the GOP members would vote to convict.
Other members of Congress who have made comments about impeachment include: Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif.; Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.; Rep. Kerry Bentivolio, R-Mich.; Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas; Rep. Blake Farenthold, R-Texas; Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla.; Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah; Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C.; Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.; R-Texas; Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas; Rep. Trey Radel, R-Fla.; Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa; and Rep. Ted Yoho, R-Fla.
“I think he”s breaking the law if he strikes without congressional approval,” Hunter told the Washington Times regarding Obama’s plan to bomb Syria. “And if he proceeds without Congress providing that authority, it should be considered an impeachable offense.”
Read the definitive case for removing Barack Obama from office in “Impeachable Offenses” by Aaron Klein and Brenda J. Elliott.
WND previously reported Coburn’s statement that Obama is “perilously close” to qualifying for impeachment.
Speaking at the Muskogee Civic Center in Oklahoma, the senator said, “What you have to do is you have to establish the criteria that would qualify for proceedings against the president, and that’s called impeachment.”
Coburn said it’s “not something you take lightly, and you have to use a historical precedent of what that means.”
“I think there’s some intended violation of the law in this administration, but I also think there’s a ton of incompetence, of people who are making decisions,” he said.
A constituent then responded, “Even if there is incompetence, the IRS forces me to abide by the law.”
Coburn said he agreed.
“Those are serious things, but we’re in a serious time,” he said. “I don’t have the legal background to know if that rises to high crimes and misdemeanor, but I think they’re getting perilously close.”
Days earlier, Bentivolio said it would be a “dream come true” to impeach Obama.
Bentivolio told the Birmingham Bloomfield Republican Club Meeting, “You know, if I could write that bill and submit it, it would be a dream come true.”
He told constituents: “I feel your pain and I know. I stood 12 feet away from that guy and listened to him, and I couldn’t stand being there. But because he is president I have to respect the office. That’s my job as a congressman. I respect the office.”
Bentivolio said his experience with the president caused him to consult with attorneys about what it would take to remove Obama from office.
Cruz responded to a question about impeachment after a speech.
“It’s a good question,” Cruz said. “And I’ll tell you the simplest answer: To successfully impeach a president you need the votes in the U.S. Senate.”
source
