Mainstream News has become the Band on the Titanic....
Alternative, Breaking, World News that Reports what the Mainstream Media Ignores.
Welcome to "The Honest Intelligence"
Please see Copyright information at bottom of page...

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Active Duty Soldier Illegally Disarmed and Arrested



This is his story:

Published on Apr 15, 2013
On March 16, 2013, my son and I were hiking along country roads among pastures and fields with my 15-year old son to help him earn his hiking merit badge. I always enjoy these father/son hikes because it gives me time alone with my son. As I always do when we go on these hikes and walks, I took my trusty rifle with me as there are coyotes, wild hogs, and cougars in our area. In Texas, it is legal to openly carry a rifle or shotgun as long as you do so in a manner that isn't calculated to cause alarm. In other words, you can't walk around waving your rifle at people. I always carry my rifle slung across my chest dangling, not holding it in my hands.

At about the 5 mile mark of our hike, a voice behind us asked us to stop and the officer motioned for us to approach him. He got out of his car and met us a few feet later. He asked us what we were doing and I explained that we were hiking for my son's merit badge. He then asked me what I'm doing with the rifle, to which I responded in a calm manner, "Does it matter, officer? Am I breaking the law?"

At that point, the officer grabbed my rifle without warning or indication. He didn't ask for my rifle and he didn't suggest he would take it from me. He simply grabbed it. This startled me and I instantly pulled back - the rifle was attached to me - and I asked what he thought he was doing because he's not taking my rifle. He then pulled his service pistol on me and told me to take my hands off the weapon and move to his car, which I complied with. He then slammed me into the hood of his car and I remembered I had a camera on me (one of the requirements of the hiking merit badge is to document your hikes). This video is the rest of that encounter. Up to this point, I am not told why I am being stopped, why he tried to disarm me, or even that I'm under arrest.

We did not set out that Saturday morning to "make a point" or cause problems. Our goal was to complete a 10-mile hike and return home without incident. My son chose a route that was away from populated areas but near our home.

The arresting officer is Officer Steve Ermis and the supervisor is Sergeant Minnicks of the Temple Police Department.

If you agree this was a gross act of exceeded authority, please help me fight these charges: http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/2nd..

Ammonium Nitrate Mixed With Negligence Behind Texas Fertilizer Plant Explosion – experts

Ammonium Nitrate Mixed With Negligence Behind Texas Fertilizer Plant Explosion – experts

The massive explosion at a fertilizer plant near Waco, Texas, must have been caused by ammonium nitrate, and couldn’t have gone off without negligence by the facility’s employees, chemists who talked to RT about the incident agree.

The blast occurred on Wednesday night and was so powerful that it caused a 30-meter-fireball and was registered as a 2.1 magnitude quake by seismologists.

Police say between five and 15 people are estimated to have been killed in the disaster so far, but there are fears that the overall death toll will reach dozens.

More than 160 people have been taken to hospitals, with 24 of them in critical conditions. The city of West, which neighbors the plant, is evacuated due to the contamination by toxic fumes.

“The most likely cause of the powerful explosion is the ammonium nitrate, a fertilizer and pesticide, which is also a powerful explosive and is known to have caused quite a number of disasters around the world,” UK chemist Christopher Busby said. “America’s most deadly disaster, in Texas City in 1947, happened when a fire detonated 2,300 tons of ammonium nitrate stored on a ship.”

The expert added that apart from the damage from the blast itself and the fire it started in the neighborhood, the incident poses other risks to health. For instance, the Texas plant stored large amounts of ammonia, a gas used to produce ammonium nitrate.

“Ammonia is very toxic. It’s a respiratory irritant and it would cause serious upper respiratory tract problems. And it’s also produced when ammonium nitrate itself is heated up. If you heat it up to about 3,500 degrees, it dissociates into ammonia and nitride acid. These two would be quite toxic fumes to anyone inhaling them,” he explained.

Doctor John Price, a professor of mechanical engineering from Australia, stressed that such a larger amount of ammonium nitrate shouldn’t have been stored so close to an inhabited area. 

“Well, the question is the ammonium nitrate,”
he said. “Now, the quantities of ammonium nitrate that exploded during this event is about, I would say, something in the order of the hundred tons as the ammonium nitrate exploded, which means that was being stored only in the next block on the side of the town. And it resulted that the explosion has ripped through the town with a very strong pressure pulse, which has damaged many buildings.”


He also commented on the footage of the blast, speaking about its possible causes and pointing out some lethal mistakes which were made as the crisis was tackled.

“People were watching the fire from a distance of about 1km from the plant. The fire was very large at that stage and what happens is the fire then goes underneath probably one of the ammonium nitrate storage vessels and eventually heats it up until it explodes. It takes about half-an-hour to an hour for fire to explode in an ammonium nitrate storage vessel."


“So this is what has happened, that the fire has got out of control and basically heated up the vessel. What seems to me to be wrong about this whole incident is that instead of evacuating the plant, when the fire establishment could not control it, there seemed to be brought up more and more fire people and they were putting them at risk. I don’t know, it sounds as if there have been a lot of deaths among fire people,” he added.
The chief safety expert at the Russia’s Nitrogen Industry Institute, Igor Solovyev, reminded that there haven’t been any serious accidents at fertilizer plants in half a century and that serious violations of safety arrangements must have led to the Texas explosion.

”The burning of some flammable materials could’ve caused the blast,”
he said.

“Undoubtedly, the human factor is to blame here. It’s 100 per cent. There aren’t that many things, which can explode at the fertilizer production. The ammonium nitrate or saltpeter is, possibly, the only one. The explosions of the ammonium nitrate stated occurring about 80 years ago when the technologies were only being developed and the switch to large-scale produce was made. Back then it happened due to the lack of information. But there were no such explosions during the last 50 years.

“The fire-safety rules must’ve been violated. I don’t know about the US, but in Russia the organic, flammable materials are forbidden from being stored together with ammonium nitrate. They could’ve simply brought some timber and organize a temporary storage. If it caught fire and the saltpeter was around – especially, if it was in an enclosed space – it could’ve promoted the detonation,”
Solovyev added.


source

‘False-flag’ Meme Goes Mainstream on Boston Marathon Bombings

On September 11th, 2001, the US media began chanting “Bin Laden” in unison almost from the moment the attack was reported. The possibility that US government insiders had orchestrated the attack - in order to blame Muslims, launch wars on Muslim countries, and seize near-absolute power - was never mentioned.

Bin Laden's repeated statements that he deplored the 9/11 attacks, considered them un-Islamic, and suspected that American supporters of Israel were behind them failed to penetrate the corporate media bubble. When the FBI definitively stated that Bin Laden was “not wanted” for 9/11 because there was “no hard evidence” of his involvement, the media blacked out the story.

 
But after the Boston bombings of April 16th, 2013, even the corporate monopoly media could no longer ignore the possibility of a false-flag attack. Yahoo News asked “Who's behind the Boston Marathon bombings?” and offered 4 theories: (1) Islamic jihadists, (2) Right-wing militia types, (3) the government, and (4) a criminally-insane lone wolf.

Numbers (1), (2), and (4), of course, are the usual suspects. But including (3) “the government” on the suspects list is unprecedented for a mainstream news story reporting on a domestic terror incident.

The false-flag meme's growing prominence was underlined at Massachusetts governor Deval Patrick's press conference after the bombings. The first question for Governor Patrick came from Infowars correspondent Dan Bidondi, who asked whether the bombings were “a false-flag staged event..to take away our civil liberties.” Patrick, of course, answered “no.”

Even the Atlantic Monthly, a neocon-lite magazine associated with names like Goldberg and Hitchens, felt compelled to publish a story headlined: “What Is a 'False Flag' Attack, and What Does Boston Have to Do with This?” Amazingly, the Atlantic article stated that yes, there is historical precedent for viewing the Boston bombing as a false-flag event. The author, Philip Bump, even admitted: “If the Boston attack had been a 'false flag' attack, Gov. Patrick would have responded 'no' anyway.”

What has changed since 2001 to bring the false-flag meme into the limelight?

Short answer: The 9/11 truth movement. During the past decade, millions of activists have been working to awaken the American and global publics to the evidence that 9/11 was an American Reichstag Fire. Polls show that 36% of Americans - roughly 100 million people - think it likely that 9/11 was an inside job. Many of these truth-seekers are highly-accomplished scientists, engineers, military and intelligence officers, and other experts. You can meet some of them at PatriotsQuestion911.com and AE911Truth.org.
 

Since the corporate mainstream media and the foundation-funded pseudo-alternative media have refused to report the facts about 9/11, roughly 100 million Americans consider the media moguls pathological liars. Even among the almost 200 million Americans who are not up-front 9/11 skeptics, the vague sense that something is wrong, and that the media and the politicians are lying, is widespread. A recent Pew Research poll, for example, showed that Americans' trust in government has fallen to an all-time low: Fewer than one-third of Americans trust the government, while more than two-thirds do not.
As the people lose faith in their government, and the corporate media crumbles into bankruptcy, a vibrant new independent media has sprung up on the internet. The Alex Jones media empire, which pushes the false-flag meme about as hard as it can be pushed, now reaches an estimated five to ten million people. Jeff Rense, Mike Adams, Mike Rivero, Veterans Today, American Free Press, and the foreign-run English language outlets Press TV and Russia Today also reach large and influential audiences with honest reporting about false-flag events.

Today, it isn't just a few marginalized radical intellectuals who think “false-flag” when they hear about an alleged domestic terror incident. Millions of people are sharing their suspicions about the Boston bombings on Facebook, Twitter, the blogosphere, and internet media in general.

Are they right?

Though it is too early to know for sure, the Boston bombings featured the most important telltale sign of a false-flag op: A terror drill running simultaneously, mirroring the actual attack. As Webster Tarpley has explained in his book 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA, false-flag attacks such as 9/11 and 7/7 are designed as drills that suddenly “go live.” This allows insiders to plot and execute the attacks under cover of the drills, with the “Team B” bad guys actually carrying out the attacks they were supposedly going to feign.

September 11th, 2001 had been previously designated as by far the biggest special operations day in US history, with a total of 46 pre-planned drills and exercises, including live-fly planes-into-buildings exercises, providing cover for the insider attacks. (Google “Tarpley 46 drills of 9/11” for details.)

July 7th, 2005 also featured terror drills that went live. Peter Power, the UK's biggest terror consultant, admitted on live television that all of the actual bombs that devastated London that day exploded at the exact times and places envisioned in the drills.

Were the Boston bombings a drill that went live?

Mobile, Alabama TV station Local TV 15 reported:

University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach, who was near the finish line of the Boston Marathon when a series of explosions went off, said he thought it was odd there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines.

“They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about,” Coach Ali Stevenson told Local 15. “It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.”

At 12:53 pm local time, the Boston Globe newspaper tweeted: “Officials: There will be a controlled explosion opposite the library within one minute as part of bomb squad activities.”

Then almost two hours later, at 2:50 p.m., bombs exploded near the finish line of the Boston Marathon, killing three people and injuring more than 100 others.


Just a coincidence? Maybe. But since all of the biggest “terror attacks” in recent US history, including the two World Trade Center bombings and the Oklahoma City bombing, have been inside jobs, and since most of the “terror plots” discovered in the US since 9/11 have been created by the FBI, we have every right to be suspicious.

Terror bombings have only one beneficiary: Governments, and the wealthy families that own them.

As Vincent Vinciguerra, one of the perpetrators of the Operation Gladio terror attacks, explained: “You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force . . . the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security.”

Whatever the truth about the Boston bombings, it seems that the false-flag meme is infiltrating mainstream discourse. And it isn't going to go away . . . at least not until 9/11 and other false-flag crimes are solved, and effective measures instituted to protect the public against the scourge of false-flag terror. 


source



Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Boston Bombing Battery Evidence May Have Come from Our Military...

 
The battery that was found as part of the evidence at the Boston Bombing site; pictured above, is not a battery that would be normally found at your local hardware, pharmacy, or walmart store, to be able to buy anonymously, with pocket cash.  The battery pictured above is a Tenergy Sub C 3000mAh SubC NiMH Flat Top Battery; not easy to find unless you search online, and order online; therefore leaving an identifiable purchase trail, but the Tenergy Corporation, established in 2004 in Silicon Valley California, states that: "Tenergy is a leader in providing customer battery solutions for military applications."  The webpage is pictured below...



UPDATE:
I was wondering how long it would take mainstream news to find my story here, on the source of the battery evidence found at the Boston Marathon Bombing site, and today (Apr 18th) I have seen CNN discredit the source...  I guess they found my investigative findings here, and CNN is now trying to convince the masses that these batteries are found in all remote controlled toys...  They will show their little recording of that over and over, and with repetition, plant it into everyone's minds as true.

I'm sorry, but every remote controlled toy I have ever bought, (if it didn't state on the package that "batteries are not included") had a battery pack that either contained no labels on the batteries, or separately wrapped batteries, ALWAYS from China.  NEVER were there batteries included, of the high caliber that "Tenergy" batteries are.

I'm telling you, folks, this IS a False Flag, and was created and carried out by our own Government.  My gut told me the moment I saw this on the news, and there is now too much evidence to prove that this IS a False Flag.  My heart goes out to all that were injured, and the families that lost loved ones in this horrific event; that will be used to implement more lost freedoms within our once great nation.

False Flags are used to put the citizens into fear, so they run to the government begging for more security, and gladly give up MORE of their own freedoms of movement within their own nation.  Mainstream News Sources are the tools they use, to spread this fear.

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Oddities and Warning Signs From the Boston Bombings - Is it too early to call this undeclared martial law? If so, what else needs to happen before we do? Curfews?

Much like the Sandy Hook shootings, the Boston bombings already have inconsistencies and oddities that need to be explored.

Did authorities know the bombings where going to occur?

Boston officials and witnesses on the scene admit that bomb sniffing dogs and roof spotters were employed before the race even began.

University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach, Ali Stevenson, “said he saw law enforcement spotters on the roofs at the start of the race. He’s been in plenty of marathons in Chicago, D.C., Chicago, London and other major metropolitan areas but has never seen that level of security before.

The local bomb squad was also coincidentally running a “controlled explosion drill” only one mile away from the attack.

As an eyewitness reports, once the bombs went off, officials began announcing, “this is just a drill!” This logically means they were all informed of the “bomb drill” beforehand. Otherwise, why would they respond with, “this is just a drill” ?

Here are a few more oddities:

Mike Heiliger, 59, said a woman holding several bags was telling runners who were picking up their pre-race packages in downtown Boston on Saturday (April 13) that they were going to die if they participated in the event.

“I was downtown on Saturday and you know, you see these people on the street and think it’s just some nutbar,” he told The Chief from his Boston hotel on Monday. “It was a little creepy because you can identify who the runners are and I heard her say to this runner two feet away from me that, ‘If you run tomorrow you’re going to die.’”

Newsmax reports, “Screenshots of a Facebook page started floating around Monday shortly after the bombings. The page, which was reportedly created two days prior and has since been deleted, was a memorial page with the title, “Thoughts Go out To All Those Involved In The Boston Explosions.” But how could a memorial page be set up before the bombings occurred?”

And Infowars reports “An episode of the popular show Family Guy which was first aired less than a month ago eerily predicted the Boston Marathon bombings, depicting the main character detonating two bombs in addition to winning the marathon by killing the rest of the participants. . .

. . .The image of Peter killing the Boston Marathon runners even shows blood and missing limbs, a chilling reminder of the very real scenes of carnage we saw yesterday.”

These details, what happened before and during the event, are fascinating to a point but also a distraction. It is the immediate future that now must be considered carefully. Who did it and why?

Many people feel the destruction of America will be financial in nature. They point to America’s debt and horrid economy combined with the disastrous global finances as evidence.

But make no mistake, there are just as many concerned analysts that have been saying, for a longer period of time, that the destruction (or salvation) of America will be violent in nature, a second civil war. These folks believe both the tyrannical government and the militias stand ready and all that is necessary is a spark—for example, a declaration of martial law or an organized door-to-door movement to confiscate guns—to trigger hostilities.

Could this be it?

Unfortunately, the pieces are coming together.

The propaganda press is beginning to demonize the right.

CNN news host Wolf Blitzer, who has served at CNN for some 22 years and has an even longer history serving Zionism, wondered if the dirty deed was tied to “Patriot’s Day”, a state holiday in Massachusetts that celebrates the Battles of Lexington and Concord, the first battles of the American Revolution.

So, is Blitzer implying it was anti-government patriots behind the bombings? The Tea Party Revolt occurred in Boston, perhaps it was the tea-party patriots. Of course, it could have been IRS agents–yesterday was tax day, too.

CNN wasted no time parading out a “national security analyst” who proceeded to outline only two possible culprits for the bombings: al-Qaeda or “right-wing extremists.”

And it seems the government is making moves.

ABC reports, “Massachusetts National Guard increases troops in Boston from 460, at the time of the marathon, to 1,000.”

Just a quick question, why were there 460 troops initially in the city for the race?

The Boston Herald reports “Copley Square under lockdown, the Common converted into a National Guard staging area and a flood of law enforcement officials patrolling Boston.” It also reported the National Guard has secured a 15-block area.

Bay News is reporting that a no-fly zone has been established for an indefinite period of time, bridges have been closed and the Coast Guard has increased patrols in Boston Harbor.

And perhaps most concerning is that Gov. Patrick announced “that commuters should expect random bag checks.”

Without giving it much thought, you might think that random bag checks are part of the investigation. But the bombing occurred yesterday. What villain is going to be walking around a day or more after the act with a bag full of evidence?

How long are these “random” checks going to last? How do authorities decide who to “randomly” search? Apparently, all people who happen to be in Boston are suspects.

If we assume authorities are searching for bombing evidence like explosive materials or detonators then what happens if they search somebody and discover lots of cash or narcotics or a gun? Can the individual be arrested? Isn’t that an illegal search?

This makes me a little uncomfortable.

If you shut the bridges down, or even severely limit traffic flow with check-points, you have, for all effective purposes, clamped-down the city—not just a 15 block area. Plus there is a no fly zone, the National Guard is in the streets and the Coast Guard is in the harbor. And you can bet your last gold coin, the FBI and DHS has a strong presence within the city, too.

All this in just 24 hours?

No, I’m sorry, but I don’t like how this is developing. Not at all.

Is it to early to call this undeclared martial law? If so, what else needs to happen before we do?

Curfews?

source

FALSE FLAG EVENT - Authorities Announced “Drill” BEFORE Boston Explosions, and Facebook Page Created for the Boston Explosions Two Days BEFORE it Happened...

University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach, who was near the finish line of the Boston Marathon when a series of explosions went off, said he thought it was odd there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines.
 
"They kept making announcements to the participants do not worry, it's just a training exercise," Coach Ali Stevenson told Local 15.

Stevenson said he saw law enforcement spotters on the roofs at the start of the race. He's been in plenty of marathons in Chicago, D.C., Chicago, London and other major metropolitan areas but has never seen that level of security before.
 
"Evidently, I don't believe they were just having a training exercise," Stevenson said. "I think they must have had some sort of threat or suspicion called in."

CNN reports a state government official said there were no credible threats before the race.
(Editor's Note: "...no credible threats..."  He didn't say there were no threats..... )

Stevenson had just finished the marathon before the explosions. Stevenson said his wife had been sitting in one of the seating sections where an explosion went off, but thankfully she left her seat and was walking to meet up with him.

"We are just so thankful right now," Stevenson said.


Also, This afternoon, I decided to look on Facebook, to see if there was a page dedicated to the victims, and this is what I found, below.  THIS PAGE WAS CREATED ON SATURDAY THE 13TH!!!! .....TWO DAYS BEFORE THE MARATHON!
Top of Page:
Bottom of Page, Showing WHEN it Was Created!:
You can view this page yourself, at: https://www.facebook.com/TheBostonExplosions

MORE!!!!!!

YOU KNOW THE HORRIFIC PHOTO OF THE MAN WITH BOTH HIS LEGS BLOWN OFF, SUPPOSEDLY BY THE BOMB?  Look At The Photo Below!!!!  Another Crisis Actor!!!!
(They removed the photo link today, but luckily I had this saved on my computer, so have uploaded this photo today) "They" don't like being revealed!!!


I believe we will shortly have Military stop points throughout the country, implementing Marshal Law.  GOD HELP US!  I hope the militias are ready to begin the fight to get our country back, because if not, then it is too late!


Doctors: Boston Victims Had Nails, Pellets

UPDATE: Apr 16, 2013
The two bombs that ripped through the crowds at the Boston Marathon, killing three people and wounding more than 170, were fashioned out of pressure cookers and packed with shards of metal, nails and ball bearings, a source said.

Monday, April 15, 2013

Witnesses Describe Boston Marathon Blasts - FBI Takes the Lead in Boston Probe

Published on Apr 15, 2013
An Associated Press reporter and two witnesses near the twin blasts that rocked the Boston Marathon finish line Monday describe what they heard and saw.

Published on Apr 15, 2013
The FBI is taking charge in the criminal investigation of the explosions at the Boston Marathon that killed three people and injured more than 130 others. An official said 'it is a potential terrorist investigation.'

note:  Is this another 9/11 False Flag to bring Marshall law in???